|
Post by Breeze on Sept 13, 2007 1:57:36 GMT -5
Ive been learning CSS for a short time... so I'd really appreciate your opinion on this layout PREVIEWwhat do you think/ how should I improve it? thanks!
|
|
Larry Laffer
Dream Mirror
l33t Smartass
I shall not BOW! EVER!
Posts: 6,625
|
Post by Larry Laffer on Sept 13, 2007 2:31:20 GMT -5
Well, in both layouts, the untitled_1 header image breaks the layout(in Firefox... you should really test layouts on multiple browsers) And by the way, family names that contain spaces should be quoted! Good: font-family: "century gothic"; Bad: font-family: century gothic; Oh, and I'd go for #1, apparently, according to popular demand, boxes are no longer "hip"... something to do about not-looking-web-2.0* *You should be VERY happy I'm not actually writing my 50 rows-long web 2.0 rant!
|
|
|
Post by Breeze on Sept 13, 2007 2:54:50 GMT -5
And by the way, family names that contain spaces should be quoted! Good: font-family: "century gothic"; Bad: font-family: century gothic; ehem... actually the font-family names are put between ' and ' I forgot to put them ^_^' and... hm... I must resolve the problem with Firefox - I don't have Firefox... could someone give me some ideas or at least make a screencap of my site viewed with Firefox?
|
|
Larry Laffer
Dream Mirror
l33t Smartass
I shall not BOW! EVER!
Posts: 6,625
|
Post by Larry Laffer on Sept 13, 2007 3:12:00 GMT -5
er... yeah, that! But single quotes are needed only when you use the "style" attribute. ... Which you don't... But still! I refuse to admit I made a stupid typo!
|
|
|
Post by Breeze on Sept 13, 2007 3:39:12 GMT -5
but you did. can you prove it was just a typo? EDIT: fixed!
|
|
Lemonachi
Dream Mirror
Where did everyone go?!
Posts: 6,260
|
Post by Lemonachi on Sept 13, 2007 9:39:34 GMT -5
It looks very nice good job with CSS haha mine were a bit worse than this, but the colors to me just look a bit bland. If you want maybe you could use more contrasting colors?
|
|
|
Post by Breeze on Sept 13, 2007 10:32:27 GMT -5
^^ thank you. i will try to find some... more brightful colors ;D that wouldn't look worse
|
|
Lemonachi
Dream Mirror
Where did everyone go?!
Posts: 6,260
|
Post by Lemonachi on Sept 13, 2007 11:13:49 GMT -5
No problem. Haha bright colors oh my as long as they're not BRIGHT PINK, PURLE and what not I think it would be ok. Maybe this site will help in color scheming? www.colorcombos.com/
|
|
|
Post by Breeze on Sept 13, 2007 11:28:54 GMT -5
aww... great site lemonachi! :> thank you so much! I will defienetely use those combos.
|
|
Lemonachi
Dream Mirror
Where did everyone go?!
Posts: 6,260
|
Post by Lemonachi on Sept 13, 2007 12:53:04 GMT -5
You're welcome ;D and I'm glad you find it useful!
|
|
|
Post by Breeze on Sept 14, 2007 10:52:11 GMT -5
uhm... here's a PREVIEW of how the layout turned out. I... kinda like the other one more xD but heh, what'ya think?
|
|
Larry Laffer
Dream Mirror
l33t Smartass
I shall not BOW! EVER!
Posts: 6,625
|
Post by Larry Laffer on Sept 14, 2007 12:05:58 GMT -5
but you did. can you prove it was just a typo? Yes! And Lemonachi: Contrasting? Bright? Is -by any chance- your scheme to burn the eyes of all people underway? Because you promised to let me know when it is!
|
|
Lemonachi
Dream Mirror
Where did everyone go?!
Posts: 6,260
|
Post by Lemonachi on Sept 14, 2007 14:48:21 GMT -5
Haha I don't remember saying blind people's eyes... besides Breeze's new layout is hardly blinding.
I really love the new color scheme! The different sections pop out more.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Sept 15, 2007 10:31:07 GMT -5
They're both pretty Breeze, but I like the second preview better. Also partly because I didn't really like the font for the header on the first one since it seems squished in the left hand side.
|
|
|
Post by Breeze on Sept 15, 2007 10:55:17 GMT -5
o-okay, guys ;D thanks so much... I'll be working on it xD I guess... in my free time
|
|